Perhaps Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Probably not, since most lumberjacks do not carry their axes generally around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence occurred in a village club in Fontaniva, Italy, in which a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some naive slots devices after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip websites that are streaming where people can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either this is an indicator of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular. When coping with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all the right time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete great deal of cash. He’s a laborer and only works any now and then.’ evidently, this will be one worker whom keeps their equipment that is own handy.
‘He’s normally a really quiet man. He just moved in very calmly with an axe and smashed all the devices. There were a few customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
Because of this of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the guy was sentenced for half a year for criminal damage and possession of an unpleasant weapon. But jail overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second of those two tales is really a bit more terrifying, since the axe was wielded maybe not at the slots, but at a member of the employees at a betting shop in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in a state of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with some money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or even worse if he don’t comply.
A authorities spokesperson investigating the crime said that two men, both putting on ski masks, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm regarding the nights the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant with all the tree-chopping weapon.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police called a ‘quantity of cash,’ while the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by way of a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the neighborhood public for information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive on the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While every of the three certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has received its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight on the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one such proposition that would put a casino in the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal option is pertaining to the idea that neighboring communities could be suffering from casino projects, but won’t have an opportunity to vote on whether those casinos is opened in the first place. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, is one of a handful of candidates whom have recommended that all of Boston should have the ability to vote on a casino that could be positioned in East Boston, for instance.
It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it might have on many Boston neighborhoods.
‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in just one single community,’ Conley said throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and social burdens but get none of the proposed benefits.’
According to the state laws that produced the chance for three new casinos in Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not to allow the projects to be built. However, casino designers are needed to negotiate settlement, with arbitration needed in the event that casinos and governments that are localn’t come to a resolution by themselves.
Conley has proposed taking a path that is not really outlined in the 2011 casino law regarding the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being manufactured by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the complete city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while nevertheless granting East Boston veto power throughout the whole vote. In other words, the casino could have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the whole city to be able to be approved.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the whole town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% had been and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even if voters back these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by the state due to the fact site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, addititionally there is a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken up to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced his discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his or her own hand caught in the activities book cookie jar after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier sports company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a gambling store critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nevertheless accepted the big contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double requirements.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one for the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the many betting outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the country- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the neighborhood streets of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’
‘we understand there is certainly concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with betting shops and payday loan organizations that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna says?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says a very important factor in public places and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that’s very unusual for the politician.
Spared on a Technicality
Nevertheless, fighting back the corner for the Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna stated that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a personal capacity, and was accepted in accordance aided by the rules and precisely declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working office of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, as well as for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is not head of the Gala royal vegas slots Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it is a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party may just be looking to ruin the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using such a difficult stance against the spread of the industry in his local constituency.
‘ The thing that is only know he undoubtedly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ claimed Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is considered to be a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this season his office had been accused of editing their Wikipedia page to exhibit evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.